Weight Watchers PointsPlus Formulas
Looking closely at PointsPlus equations for women and men
PointsPlus Requirements for a 40 year old, 5'4" woman
Let's start with Equation 17, that computes the total energy expenditure (TEE) using gender (female), height (in meters), age, and weight (in kilograms): TEE = 387 - (7.31 * age) + 1.14 * (10.9 * weight + 660.7 * height).[FN2]
Next up, the adjusted total energy expenditure (ATEE) is computed with adjustments made for conversion cost of nutrients into usable form for the body (10%) and for foods treated as having zero PointsPlus value (add 200 calories): ATEE = TEE - (TEE * 0.10) + 200.
The real "magic" though happens in equation 19 where the fancy sounding "predetermined whole number benchmark data" or PWNB is computed. For the sake of sanity we will refer to this as the initial daily PointsPlus target (IDP): IDP = min(max((ATEE - 1000) / 35,29),71).[FN3]
To keep working in calories, we will look at the initial daily calorie target (IDC): IDC min(max((ATEE-1000), 1000), 2500).
The graph now highlights the first small shift, less of a calorie deficit than you would expect. But quick checks of these formulas in point terms lead to the quick revelation that Weight Watchers was sneaky, the IDP, or PWNB, does not match the targets anyone was given.
We will leave potential issues of patent invalidity due to failure to disclose the best mode to the side and focus on how the actual daily PointsPlus target is computed. The 49-weekly PointsPlus values, or 7 a day, is one missing piece. The other is another 4 that many believe relates to the foods with calories treated as having 0 PointsPlus value, e.g. fruit. But just subtracting 11 will not give the right results either. Weight Watchers still keeps the formula bounded below by 1000 calories, or 29 daiy PointsPlus values.
So appropriately modifying equation 19 in the patent for the actual daily PointsPlus target (ADP): ADP = min(max((max(ATEE-1000,1000) / 35) - 7 - 4, 29), 71).
Or keeping with calories, actual daily calorie target (ADC): ADC = min(max(max(ATEE-1000,1000) - 245 - 140, 1000),2500).
Interlude - An Analogy
Comparing Losing Weight on Weight Watchers PointsPlus to a Game Show
A friend came up with this analogy to explain where things came off the rails. Pretend you are going on an odd game show where the producers are giving you money each day based on a complex formula. You will be given between $1,000 and $2,500 a day. If the formula says you will get less than $1,000, the producers give you $1,000 anyhow. That's a smaller calorie deficit than expected, number one.
Now, the producers want you to be able to splurge now and again and also not have to worry about using the money for certain daily necessities. So they decide to put some of your daily money into a "weekly splurge and necessities fund" to the tune of about $400. However, these producers really do not want to hand out less than $1,000 a day to anyone, so the people who would go under $1,000 get that and the $400 also. Smaller calorie deficit than expected, number two.
Image: penywise at morguefile.
Quick Comparison - Male Participants on Weight Watchers PointsPlus
For quick comparison, similar graphs have been generated for a 40 year old, 5' 10" tall male at weights from 130 lbs to 260.[FN4]
Using the game show analogy, the man is never getting extra money at stage one, lower limit of $1000 and all of the "weekly splurge and necessities fund" is removed from his calorie target, ADC.
Conclusion on Weight Watchers PointsPlus and the 29 Point Daily Target
So let's go back to the 40 year old, 5' 4" woman and stop double-limiting her targets at 1000 calories. What would her targets look like?
That's right, smaller women would get targets based around roughly 600-800 calories (before weeklies and 0 PointsPlus value foods) or more like 17-23.
Remember: I do not advocate that anyone modify their Weight Watchers daily PointsPlus target to hit such a calorie range.
Some Thoughts in Weight Watchers' Defense:
Losing Weight on PointsPlus versus Points
- If Weight Watchers actually recommended a sub-1000 calorie a day diet they would likely be called out as irresponsible in the press for the decision. The lowest level generally considered safe/acceptable is 1200 calories a day. However, previously daily targets were as low as 18 points a day, roughly 900 calories. But if a person consumed 1/7th of their 35 weekly Flex Points per day, that would bring the bottom daily consumption close to 1,150 calories.
- On paper, the calorie target at the bottom of the new system and old systems are within 100 calories of each other: New = (29+7)*35 = 1260 versus Old = (18+5)*50 = 1,150. If you add in 0 PointPlus fruit, the New system is at 1260 + calories for the fruit.
- Theoretically anyone consuming below the ATEE line should lose weight. Even for the women whose actual daily target is adjusted, they should lose weight as long as they are below the ATEE and they are unequivocally below the theoretical ATEE.
Footnotes
- [FN1] Mathematical formulas are not, in and of themselves, patentable. See the US Supreme Court case of Gottschalk v. Benson, 409 U.S. 63 (1972). The terms Points and PointsPlus are trademarks of Weight Watchers; their use in discussing the patents is a nominative use to provide clarity to the article and to link the discussion to the patents. These calculations have not been verified or endorsed by Weight Watchers.
- [FN2] Equation 16 is fairly similar and should be used for men.
- [FN3] The actual boundaries in the patents are 1000 at the low end and 2500 at the high end, those line up with 29 and 71 PointsPlus values respectively.
- [FN4] Weights under 130 would put the male at an underweight BMI and thus make the male ineligible for participation in Weight Watchers.
Sources for "Weight Watchers PointsPlus: The Problem of 29"
References utilized for this article
- David Kirchhoff. "2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans now out in the wild. The recommendations look curiously familiar... " Man Meets Scale, February 6, 2011.
- US Patent Publication 2010/0080875A1, assigned to Weight Watchers International, Priority Date August 29, 2008.
- Weight Watchers - Wikipedia entry.
- Nicole Pellegrini. "Weight Watchers Introduces PointsPlus: A Critical Examination of the New Plan." Associated Content from Yahoo! January 23, 2011.
- "Classic WW/Tuning the New Plan to Our Needs!" - SparkPeople Team.
Weight Watchers on Twitter
The official WeightWatchers Twitter account
WeightWatchers aka Weight Watchers
- Retweet ReplyAug 8, 2013 @ 3:33 am
@meganblair92 Way to go, Megan! We hope you're very proud of your remarkable accomplishment, for it is no doubt well-earned. - Retweet ReplyAug 7, 2013 @ 10:35 pm
RT @Rawahl: .@WeightWatchers A11 Patience.I hope that you are doing well! Just wanted to tell you about this cool new video that I just watched from my new friend and respected colleague, Dr Charles. In it, he reveals a very unusual tip for a flatter belly in just 3 to 10 days. I watched it, thought it was brilliant, and figured you might find it very helpful too.I hope that this was short and sweet enough for ya. Have an amazing day!!. Go the distance, in the end it'll totally be worth it. Keep pushing forward! WWSuccess - Retweet ReplyAug 7, 2013 @ 10:29 pm
@sckershner Congratulations, it sounds like you have a lot of determination. Be proud of yourself, you've earned it! - Retweet ReplyAug 7, 2013 @ 10:14 pm
@lorilee29 For some tips on what to eat before working out check out: http://t.co/4jH1pdij5H. Best wishes and hope you enjoy the article! - Retweet ReplyAug 7, 2013 @ 9:40 pm
RT @HuffingtonPost: Jennifer Hudson looks better than ever at LAX http://t.co/gVLkCONCEm
What Others Are Saying about Weight Watchers and Points Plus
The Latest Blog Posts and News Articles
Latest Twitter Comments about Weight Watchers Points Plus
What Are Others Saying about PointsPlus Right Now?
-
Retweet Replyxxplumcrazeexx Aug 12, 2013 @ 12:59 pm
Friday, July 20, 2012... http://t.co/8Q2kaBtIXj Breakfast dailymenu dessert dinner entree's lunch pointsplus snack WeightWatchers -
Retweet ReplyAuntNanci Aug 12, 2013 @ 11:31 am
Yummy lunch! Hard boiled egg, cucumber, lemon hummus, and 19 pretzels. 7 weightwatchers pointsplus http://t.co/gCQyROXcHm -
Retweet Replyshootingstar03 Aug 11, 2013 @ 5:14 pm
RT @TheDailyMel: Slow Cooker Paprika Pork Tenderloin - 3 PointsPlus weightwatchers - 160 calories http://t.co/Tu1k9HMS0k -
Retweet Replydaniellefairlee Aug 10, 2013 @ 11:41 pm
RT @WeightWatchers: Sweet? Spicy? You decide the heat level with our 4 PointsPlus value entree: http://t.co/3tj66vFJj6 -
Retweet Replycaptainalsmith Aug 10, 2013 @ 4:35 pm
http://t.co/USNEhSv5XB WeightWatchers 360 Program Cookbook free today -
Retweet ReplyWeightWatchers Aug 9, 2013 @ 10:50 am
@ashleyteat Hello, Ashley. Members can find PointsPlus values of many wines by entering the word 'wine' in the food tracker of their eTools. -
Retweet ReplyBikiniCountdown Aug 9, 2013 @ 8:38 am
Went back and tracked last night's bbq instead of ignoring it. Spent 52 points on dinner. Whoops! weightwatchers pointsplus -
Retweet ReplyErnieGarcia95 Aug 9, 2013 @ 12:15 am
@ErnieGarcia95: FYI: The Roasted Garlic Sirloin at @Applebees is 12 @WeightWatchers PointsPlus (w/sides!) It's the simple things. -
Retweet Replycaptainalsmith Aug 8, 2013 @ 3:08 pm
http://t.co/evxKlXOnBN FREE WeightWatchers cookbook PointsPlus FREE TODAY
More Health and Wellness Pages You Might Be Interested In...
Save Money on Groceries and Eat Healthier, Too!
Does it seem like you're just spending more and more money every month on groceries and food shopping? Is it getting harder to stick to your household shoppi...
Living With Garlic Intolerance or Allergy
Garlic. Many call it the "Stinking Rose" with fondness, but for individuals with a garlic intolerance or garlic allergy, garlic just plain stinks!...
National Infertility Awareness Week
National Infertility Awareness Week (NIAW) is a campaign sponsored by RESOLVE, the National Infertility Association. The goal of this annual event is to brin...
Raising Infertility Awareness and Coping with Fertility Struggles
Fertility is a fact of life most people take for granted. Most assume that if you want to get pregnant and have children, it will be easy once you find the r...
Weight Watchers Points Plus List and System - Robin on
robin.hubpages.com Diet and Weight Loss Weight WatchersA guide to the new Weight Watchers PointsPlus system. Pictures, videos and charts to help you succeed in losing weight using Weight Watchers.
Review: Weight Watchers Points Plus Diet Plan
www.webmd.com Weight Loss & Diet Plans Feature StoriesKathleen Zelman, MPH, RD, reviews the Weight Watchers diet plan and Weight Watchers' Points Plus system.
Weight Watchers Points Plus: The Problem of 29
www.squidoo.com Diet & Nutrition Weight LossIs Weight Watchers' PointsPlus not working for you? The problem of so many people at 29 points On February 9, 2011 Weight Watchers CEO David Kirchhoff took the ...
I Just Learned the New Weight Watchers Points Plus Program ...
www.laaloosh.com Health and Food Dieting ToolsOk, so heres the deal, folks, I went to my Weight Watchers meeting this past Saturday and learned all about the new Points Plus Program. And of I bought a ton of ...
Weight Watchers Points Plus 2012 - Squidoo : Welcome to
www.squidoo.com Diet & Nutrition Healthy EatingWeight Watchers Points Plus for 2012: Plan Changes and Modifications
Weight Watchers 2012 Points Plus Plan - Danica's Daily
danicasdaily.com/weight-watchers-2012-points-plus-planHappy Tuesday everyone! As you all know from my post last year about the NEW Weight Watchers PointsPlus Plan, I LOVE getting my hands on the new materials as soon
Weight Watchers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight_WatchersWeight Watchers International is an international company based in the United States that offers various products and services to assist weight loss and maintenance.
Weight Watchers Points Plus The New Program
danicasdaily.com/weight-watchers-points-plus-the-new-programI was up bright & early this morning so I could get my hands on the new Weight Watchers 2011 Points Plus Program Materials. I have to be the first to admit that
No comments:
Post a Comment